|
Introduction
The
cost of owning a weapon system exceeds by far its initial
purchase cost, since additional expenditures need to
be taken into account, such as acquisition of spare
parts to maintain the system operational through its
lifecycle. It has been stated that the initial investment
for the acquisition of a weapon system represents less
than 25% of the total expenses required for maintenance
purposes.
This
disproportional relationship, coupled with the continuous
shrinkage of defence budgets, highlights the need for
efficient Logistics. Logistics, as a professional discipline,
can be described as "the application of engineering,
operational and managerial skills to provide a product
with prerequisite quality, reliability, maintainability
and supportability, and to sustain safe and cost effective
utilisation of that product for its intended purpose
throughout its projected service life".
The
core of Logistics is strongly correlated and driven
from efficient identification of equipment. The latter
is performed through sophisticated systems which were
specifically designed to uniquely identify and classify
materiel. Two of those, the NATO Codification System
(NCS) and the GS1 Global Office scheme (GS1 ) were built
for the same purpose, but follow different patterns
in terms of materiel recognition.
Following
an initiative derived from discussions with the NATO
Continuous Acquisition and Lifecycle Support (CALS)
office, the Group of National Directors on Codification,
AC/135, was requested to undertake a study with a view
to examine the feasibility of linking the two systems.
For this reason a Working Group comprising of participants
from the two communities analysed different scenarios,
and finally established a linkage between the NCS and
the GS1 . Furthermore, it has been well understood throughout
the meetings, that there is a definite need for an "awareness
course" for Logisticians, who should in turn profit
from the generated advantages.
|